Contest: Design the International Reuse Symbol

Did you know there is no official symbol to represent the action ‘reuse’ in the sustainability world? People often mistake the three arrows of the ‘recycle’ symbol to stand for ‘reuse, reduce, recycle.’ Those three arrows actually represent the three steps in the recycling loop, including collecting, manufacturing, and buying products made from recycled goods.

In 1969, a recycled paperboard company issued a challenge to art and design students across the U.S. to raise awareness of environmental issues. Gary Anderson, a college student at the University of Southern California, created the icon now known as the universal recycling symbol.

Earth911.com hopes to make reuse as prevalent and recognizable as recycling by hosting a competition to design a reuse symbol. The winning design will receive a $500 prize, and the symbol will be made a part of the public domain to be reused, remixed and distributed without royalties.

Potential entrants have until Aug. 22 to submit their designs. Then, a voting period will run Aug. 23 through Sept. 6 to allow the public to determine which design is best. On Sept. 13, the winner will be announced. Continue reading

Comments (0)

Will We Use More of Something If We Have the Option to Recycle It Afterwards?

In a nutshell, yes. A recent study conducted at UC Irvine found that if we have the option to recycle something, we’re more likely to use more of it and less likely to reuse or reduce.

In their study, “Recycling Gone Bad: When the Option to Recycle Increases Resource Consumption,” researchers Jesse R. Catlin and Yitong Wang conducted two simple experiments to prove their hypothesis – that the ability to recycle may lead to increased resource usage compared to when a recycling option is not available.

In the first experiment, participants were separated into two groups. Both groups were told to test a new brand of scissors using blank pieces of paper. One group had a recycling bin and trash bin in their room and the other group had only a trash bin. Participants were then instructed to cut a series of shapes out from the paper and then to take five minutes to evaluate the scissors in any way they deemed fit.

The group that had a recycling bin at in their room used more paper to test the scissors than the group without the bin. Continue reading

Comments (1)